In a recent ruling on July 18, 2018, a father who was originally awarded residential custody of his son was hit with an order of protection filed against him by the mother of the child, naming his son as a protected person. The two parties were never married. Based upon the mother’s lack of ability to care for the minor child, the father was granted custody of the minor child in 2013 (though without any compensation in the form of child support from the mother). The mother of the minor child filed an Emergency Order of Protection against the father based on claims that the father was abusive to the minor child, which was supported by an eye witness statement, and ultimately, that the minor child was “terrified” of his father. The court found that because the father allegedly pushed the child in the head with a cell phone and was “terrified,” they were persuaded to affirm the judgment to extend the Order of Protection.
What is notable about this case is that the Order of Protection, which were entered based on the mother’s opinion and one eye witness statement, trumped the residential custody order originally granting the father custody. The begs the questions: Is the child now back living with the mother who lacked the ability to care for this very child? Will this cause a net effect of parents using orders of protections as weapons to gain custody?
Sandberg v. Brian B., 09-FA-190